>>26730cope
>https://tvch.moe/truth/res/3039.html#3250>>Calling Christianity "blind faith" is something a teenagers would do, it's a strawman, aren't you suppose to be an independent thinker? Having faith in God means we know God is real.Except we don't know that any god is real, and the existence of any of the Abrahamic gods is highly doubtful. Mainstream Christianity doesn't even have a consistent portrayal of God, since it believes the earlier and more conventionally pagan idea of God (non-omnipotent, non-omniscient, having a physical body) found in the Old Testament is divinely inspired. For example, in Genesis God apparently needed to ask Abel what happened to Cain (Genesis 4:9). He supposedly "came down" to take a look at the Tower of Babel to know what was going on and seems to have been concerned about humans reaching his level power (Genesis 11:5-6). Judges 1:19 mentions Judah being unable to defeat iron chariots with God's backing, and Ezekiel 1:27 mentions God's "waist" or "loins." From what the Bible has to say on the matter, Yahweh was much closer in nature to the other gods of the ancient Middle East than the more impersonal and Hellenically influenced one that would take root later on.
>Even the most popular Christian apologists fail to make a convincing case for their beliefs. William Lane Craig pushes the Kalam cosmological argument and makes the jump from believing that the universe must have an outside cause to assuming that the cause must be the one he's been personally invested in since high school. It's pretty clear that the "rational Christian" figures that evangelicals point to to justify their faith seem to mainly be there to placate troubled believers and keep them from leaving the fold. It's no wonder so many people are leaving the Church when even the standard bearers of "rational Christianity" are so transparently full of shit.>>The evidence for God is as old as the bible.>What evidence? I don't doubt that there's some kind of intelligence at work in the universe, but your version of God as a powerful man sitting on a throne is based on a contradictory and nonsensical (like the entire idea of God killing his son who is also himself to somehow account for humanity's sins that he should have had advanced knowledge of in the first place given his supposed omniscience) mishmash of ancient literature that doesn't seem to have much other than post-hoc rationalizations, special pleading, and unnecessarily conspiratorial thinking to support a literal interpretation of it.>>I don't really care if you disagree, It's right there in the demons you call gods and pentagrams you use, and the magic you practice. Of course you will object to everything i post, no one likes being called a devil worshiper.You're starting from the premise that everything you don't like is demonic and then working backwards from there and looking for anything you can to support your belief.
https://youtu.be/Zw2ZY2fT8eU