[ home ] [ suggest ] [ b / soy / qa / r9k / pol / webm / r / giga ] [ a / muv / tv / int / raid / sneed / x ] [ overboard ] [ rules ] [ privacy ] [ blog ] [ status ] [ wiki ] [ booru ]

/pol/ - Politics


Name
Email
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

will be working on implementing a different captcha solution that does not involve google. please be patient

File: 1632894893778.pdf (291.86 KB, TAKE ACTION v7 refs.pdf)

 No.16649[View All]

Post here? Why not. *Shrug*

Rampant anorectal violence may be one of the greatest contributors to societal decadence today. Rationale:
• It is very common — especially in pornography. Several generations now have grown up masturbating to, demanding more of, and engaging in violent behavior that should easily be considered severely criminal when more than one person is involved. Perpetrators of such violence against one or more others going unpunished is a major problem; many people are being inspired by material that should constitute incriminating evidence and that in many cases is sold for a profit. Those perpetrators even are rewarded, encouraged, and celebrated when they should instead be condemned widely and harshly and punished severely for their violent behavior.
• Widespread ignorance—particularly _willful_ ignorance—and apathy about anorectal anatomy, physiology, and health are enabling people with (self-)destructive tendencies to have a field day with such violence and to effectively spread disinformation. That unrestrained hedonism is contributing to societal decay, likely very significantly. Since so many people don't wish to think about, much less seriously discuss anorectal matters, rampant anorectal violence "flies under the radar;" people would rather focus on some other kind of erotic abuse which may not even be anywhere near as dangerous.
• Given the widespread ignorance about what an anus is supposed to look like, it's often the preferred target of people who like to disfigure body parts. Although the anus is one of our most important body parts, typically it is not valued very highly, and it commonly is denigrated and intentionally abused (treated in a harmful/injurious manner). That abuse is tolerated, or at least ignored, by far too many people. The vast majority of humanity may never care much at least about another person's anus, meaning that discouraging erotic anoreceptive activities entirely probably is the only viable solution.
85 posts and 11 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.18455

>>18453
wake up babe, new anti anal g 'nda just dropped

 No.19237

literally saving this gem from the depths of page 8

 No.19360

>>18453
That compilation is a "brown paper bag release" due to at least one significant issue. I should have spent more time reviewing the many changes and the introduced sources prior to finalizing it.

TL;DR: A new compilation is due soon.

 No.19784

Anorectal Trends, Risks, and Anatomy compilation 20211111
https://web.archive.org/web/202111/https://paste2.org/C88vDcB7
https://archive.is/2021-11/http://hguacfthfbidxv7kq2byi7xylloht626v36axg7kc7cfj722evfl2nid.onion/view/8c8407f3

Compilation changes for 2021/11/11 (excluding some minor alterations):
- [T&A] Replaced 10.1016/j.mce.2017.09.010 with 10.1007/s10508-020-01730-x
- [A&T] Dropped PMC2468313 & Human Anatomy: Female Pelvis and Breast (2009) - Page 66
- [A&T] Added 10.1038/s41575-021-00487-5
- [AR2] Dropped PMC2710774 & PMC2780175 & 10.1007/s00384-009-0803-2
- [AR2] Added 10.1177/0885066613485347
- [P&I] Dropped PMC4304171 & PMC3104390
- [P&I] Added 10.1007/s10620-020-06394-0

 No.19789


 No.19791

>>17862
Gemmy

 No.20307


 No.20308

>>16649
I've seen this on both lainchan and crystal cafe, is this supposed to be an in-joke or something?

 No.20429

>>20308
No, it's supposed to be a PSA (public service announcement) and call to action.
> lainchan
The lainchan admins and [/hum/] mods really, _really_ don't like this material. Censorship typically occurs there.
> crystal cafe
I've been thinking about creating another thread there. A thread of mine was moved from /hb/ (Health & Beauty) to /nsfw/ (a hidden board), and I'm making no more posts in the existing /nsfw/ thread unless someone else bumps it.

 No.20430

>>20429
Which thread in the ‘fe is it?

 No.20431

thats quite some dedication lol

 No.20432

>>20429
Hmm, posting from that proxy suddenly triggers the "your request looks automated" response. Weird.

>>20430
It's /nsfw/ thread 5009: https://crystal.cafe/nsfw/res/5009.html

>>20431
Thanks.

 No.20433

Soot pin this thread

 No.20589

bump

 No.20590

Pin this thread

 No.20591

>>16649
I'm curious, when do you believe that society became more accepting of sexual acts that have noreproductive value? To add, the word "sex" has become a more ambigous term, referring to sexual acts or behaviors, i.e. anal sex, oral sex, non-penatrative sex, etc. Not denying what you are saying at all, I respect your dedication, but to what benefit and to who's benefit is it to display these activities as exciting?

 No.20599

>>20591
> when do you believe that society became more accepting of sexual acts that have noreproductive value?
1. Again, ultimately this is not about me. I'm not trying to set myself up as any sort of expert. Drawing attention to the words of others is mostly what I'm aiming to do here, along with writing accurate summaries backed up by the words of (ideally many) others. I try to favor sources in this order: peer-reviewed studies, then domain-specific (usually medical) books, then news articles and web sites. I'm trying to move away from web references entirely in the long run.
2. This isn't about erotic acts with no reproductive value in general. Rather, I'm focusing specifically on anorectal eroticism and most especially violent / objectively foolish anoreceptive activities with potential for 1) significant injury to any receptive person involved, along with 2) serious/chronic/permanent and even life-threatening consequences arising subsequent to that completely avoidable trauma.

Anyway, I recommend reading the studies and news articles present in the compilation, particularly those that are part of Trends & Associations (T&A). At the bottom of this post is an article which was included in past compilations that is relevant as well.
> To add, the word "sex" has become a more ambigous term, referring to sexual acts or behaviors, i.e. anal sex, oral sex, non-penatrative sex, etc.
Yes it has. I favor the term "erotic" for activities that are not strictly sexual (i.e., for the purpose of procreation, or at least involving only genital body parts).
> Not denying what you are saying at all, I respect your dedication, but to what benefit and to who's benefit is it to display these activities as exciting?
Please spend some time reading through at least some of those sources I have referenced (and even sources cited by them), particularly ones included in T&A. If you have questions after that, you know where to find me.


"'It really is shocking how many myths young people have about anal sex,' said Judy Kuriansky, a Columbia University professor and author of 'Sexuality Education: Past Present and Future.'"
... "[Megan Carpentier, who writes about politics and women for Jezebel.com] said the dismantling of comprehensive sex education programs in the public schools is to blame for teen ignorance about the hazards of anal sex. And it is unrealistic to expect doctors to talk to teens about this touchy topic."
... "Anal sex statistics indicate that a generational change has occurred, where people born in the 1980s and later may be more comfortable admitting to or showing interest in anal sex. [Sexuality educator Cory] Silverberg attributes interest in the behavior among heterosexuals, in part, to the proliferation of pornography in the 1990s."
hxxps://abcnews.go.com/Health/study-reports-anal-sex-on-rise-among-teens/story?id=6428003 (2008/12)

 No.20600

>some Tor exit nodes are banned
That's annoying (especially when I lost a post as a result). I wish this place had an onion address. Of course, I can understand reasons why that might be undesirable. Perhaps I'll try to find a proxy that doesn't elicit the "your request looks automated" response.
>>20599
> completely avoidable trauma
Barring forced activity, that is. (I'm purposely avoiding the word "rape" since that can include consensual activity involving a person legally unable to give consent.)

 No.21007

Bump

 No.21008

>still not pinned
kys soot

 No.21246

>>17862
Diamond

 No.21247

>>17862
gemerald

 No.21692

>>17862
This diamond is back

 No.22522


 No.22524

>>22522
nigger

 No.23084


 No.23630

Scholars in the 'sharty?
This aint Ivy League. GET OUT!

 No.23631

>>17862
Sheesh that's a gem

 No.23632

File: 1644580950293.gif (2.81 MB, 370x377, 1643516477561.gif)

>Sheesh that's a gem

 No.23633

>>17862
major gem

 No.23634

>>17862
bumping this gem in case y'all didn't see it

 No.24526

>>17862
Keyed

 No.25981

>>25979
Who are you talking to?

 No.26151

>>17070
hidden azuf gem

 No.26152

File: 1648379623385.png (6.46 KB, 329x101, ClipboardImage.png)

Ermmm why does it say (You)?

 No.26153

>>26152
Soot let little jewish goblins infiltrate the sharty servers. ever since he did the revert you sometimes get random (((datamining))) jew-You's

 No.27739

>>17862
Diamond

 No.28643

>>17070
azuf gem

 No.30435

>>17862
Great post ?

 No.30436

File: 1653961719268.png (452.79 KB, 950x1019, 1652890297121.png)

>Great post ?

 No.30439

Strange ... I could've sworn that this thread was deleted at one point (I even noted it as a deleted thread in one file of mine in which I keep copies of noteworthy posts and thread statuses). If it was, then I guess it was undeleted. I didn't bother to check for this thread's existence and lack of a locked/bumplocked state before posting a new one a few days ago: >>30346

 No.30440

>>30439
i can forgive but i can't forget, someday when this thread will be on the last page, i will make a unnecessary nigger coal thread to bump it off the catty so that the only thread you will have left is the shitty dead empty one

 No.30441

>>30440
> i can forgive but i can't forget
Forgive what?

Anyway, I was and am planning to bump the new thread unless something's done to it. This thread is obsolete; the latest references compilation is 20220111, plus I've updated numerous pastes of mine as well.

 No.30460

>>17070
Buttsex leads to having a prolapsed anus. That's basically the gist of it, with some psychology about buttsex being linked to the normalization of violence thrown-in.

 No.30528

>>30460
> Buttsex leads to having a prolapsed anus.
There are many potential consequences, and I focus on the traumatic risks since they tend to be downplayed or even ignored in favor of STI risks. For people who still have hemorrhoidal cushions (i.e., they weren't removed) that remain more-or-less healthy, anal/hemorrhoidal prolapse is a likely consequence of anorectal violence as defined in >>16650: anoreceptive activity involving a combination of rapid thrusting, considerable girth, and a prolonged duration. That is due to considerable frictional sliding, aka shear, and facilitated by the internal hemorrhoidal cushions' lack of somatic innervation (meaning the cushions and their supporting tissues can be damaged without pain).
> some psychology about buttsex being linked to the normalization of violence
That is a misrepresentation. I made these claims: 1) Anorectal violence is rampant worldwide. 2) Such violence in pornography can contribute to development of related (self-)destructive mental pathology in some viewers. 3) People with such mental pathologies are having a field day at least with anorectal violence and spreading disinformation, contributing to societal decadence.
>>16650
> Blatantly injurious erotic anorectal violence—anoreceptive activity involving a combination of rapid thrusting, considerable girth, and a prolonged duration—is rampant worldwide, facilitated by widespread (willful) ignorance, apathy, and misinformation. It is impossible for resultant anorectal injuries and serious/chronic/permanent health consequences to be uncommon due to anorectal fragility relating to anatomy and neuromuscular physiology [References: Anorectal Risks 1-3]. That is why perpetration of such violence against one or more others should be considered severely criminal behavior.

> Pornography featuring that violence can have numerous effects on some viewers: inspiring them to emulate what they see, even using coercion; conditioning them to be aroused by suffering; and contributing to development of related mental pathology: sexual sadism disorder, sexual masochism disorder, and perhaps even psychopathy for younger individuals [References: Trends & Associations]. People with those inclinations are having a field day with such violence and spreading disinformation. That unrestrained hedonism is promoting societal decadence.

>>17008
I call that my short traumatic risks summary (which some people might nonetheless consider to be "tl;dr" as well). It has not changed since February 2021.

 No.30540

i don't need to read all this to know that violent ass raping is bad

 No.30574

>>30540
"Rape" can be an ambiguous term. While common parlance defines rape solely as the absence of explicit consent, some regions may include additional considerations that render consent invalid from a legal perspective. Among those considerations on the part of one or more people involved are 1) a possibility or actual result of causing serious injury to another person, 2) the presence of a significant mental disorder, 3) the utilization of a strong mind-altering substance, and 4) the use of duress or coercion.

Anorectal violence as defined most certainly does involve a possibility of causing serious injury. Some of the possible traumatic consequences and/or subsequent sequelae can be one or more of serious (even life-threatening), chronic, and permanent. For that reason alone it ought to be very concerning that far too many people do not seem to even recognize anorectal violence as constituting violence with all of the implications such a label should invoke (including potential criminal aspects when more than one person is involved).

As for the presence of a significant mental disorder, at least a severe case of sexual masochism disorder should easily invalidate legal consent. So too should duress: Coercion is a common theme for anoreceptive activities as documented by numerous sources. That shouldn't be surprising when considering various factors that were covered relating to anorectal eroticism, including people with (self-)destructive mental pathologies being drawn most especially to anorectal violence along with pornography industries worldwide among others very strongly promoting anorectal eroticism (including anorectal violence).

 No.30575

>>30574
> Coercion is a common theme for anoreceptive activities as documented by numerous sources.
Here are two:

"There are multiple, complex, and causal pathways between sexual violence, coercion, and fear of abuse and increased HIV risk. Violence victims often have limited ability to refuse unwanted sex and negotiate safe sex. Genital trauma during forced or unwanted intercourse can facilitate HIV transmission. Anal sex has recently emerged as an important and understudied risk mechanism. Qualitative evidence demonstrates that violence and coercion are a common context for anal intercourse, and quantitative evidence from India suggests a strong association of violence with anal sex."
"Sexual violence and HIV transmission: summary proceedings of a scientific research planning meeting." American Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 2013 Feb; 69(Suppl 1): 5-19. doi:10.1111/aji.12033. (PMID 23157400)

"Anal heterosex often appeared to be painful, risky and coercive, particularly for women. Interviewees frequently cited pornography as the ‘explanation’ for anal sex, yet their accounts revealed a complex context with availability of pornography being only one element. Other key elements included competition between men; the claim that ‘people must like it if they do it’ (made alongside the seemingly contradictory expectation that it will be painful for women); and, crucially, normalisation of coercion and ‘accidental’ penetration. It seemed that men were expected to persuade or coerce reluctant partners."
"Anal heterosex among young people and implications for health promotion: a qualitative study in the UK." British Medical Journal Open. 2014 Jul 18; 4(8): e004996. PMC4156810. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004996.

 No.30701

coal up

 No.30734

>>16649
TLDR buttsecks is causing the downfall of Western Civilization. We've got it boys, (((they)))'re done for.



[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home ] [ suggest ] [ b / soy / qa / r9k / pol / webm / r / giga ] [ a / muv / tv / int / raid / sneed / x ] [ overboard ] [ rules ] [ privacy ] [ blog ] [ status ] [ wiki ] [ booru ]